![]() ![]() If my modeling software weren't so out of day this would be fun to look at. However, I do agree with the idea that the filings effectively reduce the field in the vicinity - the flux will preferentially be found in the filings rather than the air.Īnd even so, separate filing won't necessarily behave the same as a solid mass, where you have additional bonds holding the material together. Thus, there's no reason for it for this proposed blob to form. Unless you have enough material to contain the entire flux without saturating, there will continue to be a field far from the magnet. No, I'm not saying the field is created that way - the field already exists. If you were to plot some lines at right angles to the chains you would find repulsive (N-N and S-S) forces in action, which is why you get spread out lines rather than a block in the middle.Īre you proposing that an interior line of filings will shield the area directly outside it (resulting in gaps with no filings), but the field will then becomes stronger again as you move outwards until it is strong enough to create another line of filing which will repeat the loop? So the system can rearrange itself when fine particles are introduced.Īnd yes, indeed there are few lines in the spaces and a concentration of lines in the chains of ferrous particles. Just as with a transformer or motor core, the field lines (want to) congregate in a ferrous material ie they are drawn into it, leaving few lines in the free space not occupied by the ferrous material.īut these paths have to be continuous through the core.Ĭores are not free to move, fine particles are. Without the filings the magnetic lines are 'evenly' distributed in space with no gaps.Įven is not exactly right since obviously the field strength diminishes with distance from the pole to pole centreline, but I think you know what I mean. Well this is a good example of a system seeking to minimise its energy. All rights reserved.As imatfaal says the iron particles line up so they are touching as continuous chains of tine induced magnets. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy and Safety Information / Your California Privacy Rights are applicable to you. ^ Back to Top ^ © 2023 ESPN Internet Ventures. Trainer: Ron Moquett Jockey: Rafael Bejarano Trainer: Terunobu Fujita Jockey: Kazushi Kimura Trainer: Dale Romans Jockey: Irad Ortiz Jr. Trainer: Bill Mott Jockey: Junior Alvarado Trainer: Hidetaka Otonashi Jockey: Christophe Lemaire Trainer: Ben Colebrook Jockey: Gerardo Corrales T rainer: Kenny McPeek Jockey: Brian Hernandez Jr. Trainer: Steve Asmussen Jockey: Joel Rosario Trainer: Gustavo Delgado Jockey: Javier Castellano Trainer: Tim Yakteen Jockey: John Velazquez ![]() Trainer: Todd Pletcher Jockey: Jose Ortiz Trainer: Keith Desormeaux Jockey: James Graham Trainer: Larry Rivelli Jockey: Jareth Loveberry Trainer: Brad Cox Jockey: Tyler Gaffalione ET according to the official Kentucky Derby website. 23 King Russell added to the field.Īll odds listed are as of Saturday, May 6, at 10:30 a.m. 20 Continuar also have been scratched, with No. Here is the full list of updated odds for the 2023 Kentucky Derby, in order of post position (with trainer and jockey). Post time for Saturday's 1¼ mile race is 6:57 p.m. 5 post, while Angel of Empire (8-1) had the third-shortest morning line odds. Tapit Trice had the second-shortest morning-line odds at 5-1 from the No. The 149th running of the Kentucky Derby will take place Saturday at Churchill Downs in Louisville, Kentucky.įorte, trained by Todd Fletcher, opened as the 3-1 morning-line favorite leaving from the 15 post after Derby post positions were released Monday but then was scratched after a morning workout Saturday. You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browserĢ023 Kentucky Derby: Updated horse odds, post positions, jockeys
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |